Court nullifies sale of Etisalat

In her ruling yesterday, Justice Binta Nyako, voided all steps taken in relation to the exchange of ownership of Etisalat, despite pending orders for maintenance of status quo, restraining parties to a suit involving investors and other stakeholders in the company from destroying the subject matter.

The judge, who faulted the transaction during the pendency of the case, noted that parties were all aware of the existence of the suit as the defendants were duly served between April 24 and 27, 2018, with the originating process.

Nyako said: “Any action that has been taken concerning the res of this litigation from the 25th day of April, which is earlier in time, should revert to the position, as of the res, to its 25th day of April 2018.”

The ruling, given on April 1, 2019, a copy of which was sighted yesterday, was in a suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/288/2018 filed on April 6, 2018, by two major investors in Etisalat, Afdin Ventures Limited and Dirbia Nigeria Limited.

Afdin and Dirbia, whose investments in Etisalat is estimated at $43,033,950, had sued to retrieve their investments on the ground that they were aggrieved, having been excluded from the decision making process of the company. They contend that “it will be in the interest of justice to set aside the sale of Etisalat Nigeria Limited, rebranded 9moible, to Teleology Nigeria Limited, and commit the defendants to prison for disobeying the lawful orders of the court.”

Court nullifies sale of Etisalat

Defendants in the suit are Karington Telecommunication Ltd, Premium Telecommunications Holdings NV, First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Etisalat International Nigeria Ltd and Nigeria Communications Commission (NCC).

The plaintiffs stated in a supporting affidavit to the motion dated November 16, 2018, that they resorted to praying the court to void the sale of Etisalat, upon learning that the defendants have proceeded to conclude the transfer the company’s ownership, despite the restraining orders made earlier by the court.

They said: “In 2009, the plaintiffs/applicants purchased a total of 4,303,391 class “A” shares from the first, second and fifth defendants (Karlingtton, Premium Telecommunication and Etisalat International) at the rate of $43,033,950 only, and were issued with share certificates.

“In 2010, the defendants rebranded Etisalat Nigeria Limited to 9mobile and entered into negotiations with and Glo Network to transfer its license without recourse to the plaintiffs.

“When the plaintiffs became aware of the purported transaction, they filed this suit along with two applications – motion ex-parte and motion on notice, seeking for an order of injunction to restrain the defendants from going ahead with the transaction.

“When this suit came up for hearing on the 17th day of April, 2018, this honourable court ordered parties to maintain status quo, pending the determination of the motion on notice. Notwithstanding the aforementioned order, the defendants continued negotiations with and Glo Network in defiance to the subsisting order of this court.

“When the plaintiffs/applicants discovered that the defendants were bent on selling Etisalat Nigeria Limited ‘rebranded 9moile’, despite the subsisting order of court, they instructed their counsel, Mahmud A. Magaii, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), to write and caution the defendants about the implication of their actions.

“Upon receipt of the above letters, the third and fourth respondents – First Bank and CBN, through their counsel, Olaniwun Aiayi, wrote to the applicants, through their counsel, on August 24, 2018, and August 31, 2018, denying the existence of the order of status quo made by this honourable court on April 17, 2018 and August 31, 2018.

“When this matter came up on October 10, 2018, counsel to the plaintiff, Okechukwu Edeze, informed the court of the attempts made by the defendants to sell Etisalat Nigeria Limited. Consequently, this honourable court made another order of status quo, directing parties to refrain from tampering with the subject matter of the suit.

“Despite the orders of this honourable court made on October 10, 2018, the defendants went ahead and sold Etisalat Nigeria limited, rebranded 9moible, to Teleology Nigeria Limited with impunity.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.